Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

2 Answers

IFR CX requirement 250NM

Asked by: 1647 views Instrument Rating

FAR 61.65 (d) (2) (ii) says

(A) A flight of 250 nautical miles along airways or by directed routing from an air traffic control facility;

(B) An instrument approach at each airport; and

(C) Three different kinds of approaches with the use of navigation systems.

 

 

In this case, 250NM means direct distance? or the actual track length that I filed and flied?

Ace Any FAA Written Test!
Actual FAA Questions / Free Lifetime Updates
The best explanations in the business
Fast, efficient study.
Pass Your Checkride With Confidence!
FAA Practical Test prep that reflects actual checkrides.
Any checkride: Airplane, Helicopter, Glider, etc.
Written and maintained by actual pilot examiners and master CFIs.
The World's Most Trusted eLogbook
Be Organized, Current, Professional, and Safe.
Highly customizable - for student pilots through pros.
Free Transition Service for users of other eLogs.
Our sincere thanks to pilots such as yourself who support AskACFI while helping themselves by using the awesome PC, Mac, iPhone/iPad, and Android aviation apps of our sponsors.

2 Answers



  1. Russ Roslewski on May 18, 2020

    The direct distance between all three airports does not have to be 250 nm. Otherwise, there would be no need for them to put the “along airways or by directed routing from an atc facility”.

    So, if A-B-C-A is 200 nm but due to airways or ATC routing, you fly 250+ nm, you are good.

    HOWEVER, I would not try to cut it that close. You may have to prove to the examiner that you flew more than 250 nm. If the airports are in fact 250 nm or more direct distance apart, then there is no more justification that needs to be done. But if they aren’t, then it can be messy. If you have a ground track recorded, then that could help. But if you don’t, how do you prove it? Easier to do that now than just a few years ago, of course.

    Furthermore, you can’t predict with absolutely certainty what routing ATC will give you – What if you end up at 249 nm – you’d have to do it again.

    FWIW, I have done this before – the direct routing was about 240 nm, but the combination of airports and approaches offered a great training benefit for the type of equipment the trainee had in his airplane. We ended up flying well more than 250 nm, and the examiner did not question it – but some might have.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  2. Mark Kolber on May 19, 2020

    I agree completely with Russ. The regulatory answer is it does not have to be direct distance. But the practical answer is, why not choose the airports it based on direct distance? Doing that provides benefits. It avoids questions. When you actually plan the flight you’ll use real anticipated routing to calculate fuel requirements and appreciate the difference. And you’ll have the real -world experience of being able to accept a friendly ATC shortcut without thinking about whether you have to say, “unable, I’m on a training flight and need the distance.”

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.

Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.