Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

1 Answers

KCRQ ILS or LOC RWY 24

Asked by: 2267 views , , ,
Instrument Rating

Three questions on this approach plate for KCRQ ILS or LOC RWY 24:

#1) Why isn't it called the "ILS or LOC/DME RWY 24"? Isn't DME required for the final approach segment? You can only identify the FAF with DME or DME-substitute (GPS/RNAV).

#2) The notes section says "DME Required". I can see why it would be required for the LOC approach to identify the FAF and MAP and step down fixes, but it doesn't appear as if it would be required for the ILS approach except for the step down at WUNUB. But if you got vectors to final, you wouldn't need DME to shoot the ILS, correct?

#3) Why are there no instructions or depictions about how to hold at OCN in the missed approach?

1 Answers



  1. John D Collins on Aug 07, 2018

    1) You can report this to https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/chart_discrepancies/ Many changes have been made over the years to naming procedures and they don’t always get updated.
    2) The step down fix is still identified by DME and the standard vector to final will place the aircraft outside WUNUB at an altitude of 2600 feet. The GS is not applicable outside of WUNUB as the step down still must be complied with.
    3) Although it is not depicted, it is described in the text. Holds by default are to the right and the radial on which the hold is in the text.

    +1 Votes Thumb up 1 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.

Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.