Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

1 Answers

What is the difference between overuse of abstractions & confusion between symbol and symbolized object?

Asked by: 1972 views ,
FAA Regulations, Flight Instructor

I have read the IPH on what the definitions for the two are, but they seem interchangeable. Is there a fundamental difference between the two, or does it depend on the frequency abstractions are used? The way I am interpreting them, abstractions can cause confusion between symbol and symbolized object, but I can not think of an example in which the confusion would occur without using an abstraction.

Ace Any FAA Written Test!
Actual FAA Questions / Free Lifetime Updates
The best explanations in the business
Fast, efficient study.
Pass Your Checkride With Confidence!
FAA Practical Test prep that reflects actual checkrides.
Any checkride: Airplane, Helicopter, Glider, etc.
Written and maintained by actual pilot examiners and master CFIs.
The World's Most Trusted eLogbook
Be Organized, Current, Professional, and Safe.
Highly customizable - for student pilots through pros.
Free Transition Service for users of other eLogs.
Our sincere thanks to pilots such as yourself who support AskACFI while helping themselves by using the awesome PC, Mac, iPhone/iPad, and Android aviation apps of our sponsors.

1 Answers

  1. Best Answer

    Mark Kolber on Apr 25, 2015

    The way they are used in the AIH, they are not interchangeable, although the difference can pretty subtle.

    The key is that all words are just symbols. When the IAH talks about symbol confusion it’s mostly talking about words that may have different meanings – Telling an ME student to feather the “right” (right as in starboard or right as in correct?) engine. The confusion can take place even with people with common experience.

    OTOH, when the IAH talks about “abstractions” it is generally referring to the use of concepts that may bring to mind different pictures to different people based on their past experience.

    Problem is the writers of the IAH don’t use particularly good examples. The IAH uses is “aircraft” which, to one person may bring to mind and airplane and to another a helicopter (how many realize the “Good “Ship” Lollipop” was an airplane?). Not a particularly good example to illustrate the difference (although it actually does (albeit poorly).

    “Abstractions” more generally consist of using concepts that are not directly related to the subject that might be relevant to some and not to others. I think a personal example is a good one. I don’t sail. One day I was sailing with a friend and she was trying to teach me how to correctly set the main. After a number of attempts to get me to understand, she finally hollered to me, “It’s an airfoil!” There was a concept I understood from aviation and I immediately set the sail to its efficient angle of attack for the conditions.

    I try to separate the two myself by thinking of “symbol confusion” being a problem of definition and “use of abstractions” as being a problem of common experience.

    The good news is, don’t worry too much about getting that deep. Despite the IAH’s discussion of the 4 levels of learning, most of the testing of IAH concepts tends to be pure rote.

    +1 Votes Thumb up 1 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes

The following terms have been auto-detected the question above and any answers or discussion provided. Click on a term to see its definition from the Dauntless Aviation JargonBuster Glossary.

Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.