Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

6 Answers

Complicated/Unclear IFR Departure Scenario

Asked by: 1681 views , ,
Instrument Rating

I have a question regarding instrument departures and ways to depart an airport under IFR.  This is a scenario I am curious about and haven't been able to find a clear answer to yet.  Say one is departing a towered and controlled airport in a single-engine piston aircraft like a C172 or a PA-28 under IFR.  The airport had a SID or two but the airplane is unable to meet the required climb gradient and as such cannot fly any of the available SIDs.  Similar story with an available ODP, the climb gradient is too high.  Say also the DVA has a climb gradient that is too great.  The weather outside is IFR so a VCOA isn't an option.  How can one depart under IFR from the airport, or is there a way to do so?  To reiterate, all published departure options (SID, DVA, ODP) have climb gradients too great and VCOA is off the table.  What options are left to depart IFR.  Thanks so much!

6 Answers



  1. Russ Roslewski on Dec 28, 2020

    Option 1: Under Part 91, you are not required to follow an existing obstacle departure (unless it’s included in your clearance) – you are permitted to “roll you own” if you like. I don’t find this to be a particularly good idea generally, as you will not have access to the obstacle and terrain databases the FAA uses to evaluate these things, nor are you likely to have the knowledge of safety margins and such that are contained in TERPS.

    Option 2: Offload weight until you can make the climb gradients.

    Option 3: Wait for better weather.

    That’s pretty much it. If this airport is going to be a regular stop for you, and the weather is regularly IMC, you may want to consider taking a higher-performing aircraft instead.

    +3 Votes Thumb up 3 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  2. Mark Kolber on Dec 29, 2020

    I agree with Russ. It’s not particularly unclear. You have a series of departures with guaranteed obstacle clearance you can’t meet. What’s left is rolling your own, taking upon yourself (and any people or property with you) all the risks associated with flying a departure for which obstacle clearance has not been officially assessed.

    From a regulatory standpoint, the risks include a potential 91.13 (careless/reckless) violation, but that’s the tiniest worry, relatively speaking.

    I did an article on rolling your own a few years ago. Sometimes this site hides links so, if interested, try to Google *not enough departures IFR magazine*.

    +2 Votes Thumb up 2 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  3. Gary S. on Jan 08, 2021

    Never heard of rolling your own but I have heard of common sense. All the nomenclature published on approach and departure plates are there for a reason…safety. As far as I’m concerned they are as much a regulation as the regulations themselves are. So…..What options are left to depart IFR? Depart as per your clearance.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  4. AviatorTrevor88 on Feb 10, 2021

    This is in response to the CFIs who answered: how do I coordinate with ATC a homebrew departure procedure?? What if my departure procedure is essentially flying a circle over the airport and using synthetic vision and TAWS for obstacle avoidance?

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  5. John D Collins on Feb 11, 2021

    Trevor,

    That form of RYO departure plan is fraught with risks. The TAWS or terrain warning features and the SVT feature are not intended for that kind of use. For example on the G500TXi, at the very top of the Pilot guide, you will find many warnings including these:

    WARNING: Navigation and terrain separation must NOT be predicated
    upon the use of the terrain function. The G500 Terrain Proximity feature
    is NOT intended to be used as a primary reference for terrain avoidance
    and does not relieve the pilot from the responsibility of being aware of
    surroundings during flight. The Terrain Proximity feature is only to be used
    as an aid for terrain avoidance and is not certified for use in applications
    requiring a certified terrain awareness system. Terrain data is obtained
    from third party sources. Garmin is not able to independently verify the
    accuracy of the terrain data.

    WARNING: Do not use Terrain-SVT information for primary terrain
    avoidance. Terrain-SVT is intended only to enhance situational
    awareness.

    If you were to use these features for this purpose, it would most likely be considered as careless and reckless operation.

    On the other hand, if you were very familiar with the airport and environment and had first hand knowledge of where the obstacles were and used a plan that would positively avoid them on climb out, that might work, particularly at an airport that did not have IFR services and therefore no DP was available.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  6. mjc123 on Dec 18, 2022

    If you are unable to meet the required climb gradients for the published departure procedures (SIDs, DVA, ODP) at an airport, and a visual climb over obstacles (VCOA) is not possible due to the weather conditions, you may be able to request a special instrument departure (SID) with a lower climb gradient from air traffic control (ATC). To do this, you should contact ATC before your departure and explain your situation. ATC may be able to offer you a special departure route with a lower climb gradient that is appropriate for your aircraft’s performance.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.