Welcome Guest. Sign in or Signup

5 Answers

Class E surface extension SVFR?

Asked by: 7788 views , , ,
Airspace, FAA Regulations

Have a look on skyvector.com at the airspace around KRDM in Oregon. It is part time class D with surface E extension to the south east. If fog is covering the runway and KRDM goes IFR do you need a SVFR to transit the surface E extension (assume it is VFR in the extension)? I don't think so and neither did KRDM tower, but anyone have other thoughts? Next question- same situation, but after the tower has closed, so the class D becomes surface E, does anything change for a transit through the extension- now that it's all surface class E? Many thanks

Ace Any FAA Written Test!
Actual FAA Questions / Free Lifetime Updates
The best explanations in the business
Fast, efficient study.
Pass Your Checkride With Confidence!
FAA Practical Test prep that reflects actual checkrides.
Any checkride: Airplane, Helicopter, Glider, etc.
Written and maintained by actual pilot examiners and master CFIs.
The World's Most Trusted eLogbook
Be Organized, Current, Professional, and Safe.
Highly customizable - for student pilots through pros.
Free Transition Service for users of other eLogs.
Our sincere thanks to pilots such as yourself who support AskACFI while helping themselves by using the awesome PC, Mac, iPhone/iPad, and Android aviation apps of our sponsors.

5 Answers



  1. Kris Kortokrax on Nov 23, 2014

    91.155 deals with weather minima. In Class E below 10,000, you need 3 miles visibility and cloud clearance as specified. There is no communication requirement as there would be to enter the Class D.

    I would think that there would be very few occasions where the airport would be IFR and the extension would not be.

    If the Class D is closed, then the D and the E extension would appear to be one contiguous piece of surface based Class E airspace and to enter it, you would need a SVFR clearance to enter it, if the weather inside the area is below VFR minima.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  2. Mark Kolber on Nov 24, 2014

    Of course, the other issue is who would issue the clearance in the extension. It’s not in the Tower’s jurisdiction (even if the Tower is open, at least in the absence of an agreement between Tower and Seattle Center).

    On the main question, seems to me if it is VFR in the extension, it is VFR in the extension. Why would one need an SVFR clearance where it’s VFR?

    I’m trying to visualize: I am VFR southeast of KRDM, traveling northeast to S39. It’s a cool, clear morning with unrestricted visibility, but as I cross into the Class E surface area, I notice that 12 miles to the northwest, there some localized early morning fog hanging right over KRDM. I can’t imagine a reason to call for an SVFR clearance.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  3. John D Collins on Nov 24, 2014

    91.155 and 91.157 are written in such a way to only prohibit flight in the Class D or E when taking off or landing or entering the pattern under VFR and not while transiting the airspace. 91.129 requires radio contact be maintained while transiting the airspace. I can’t see from the regulations where flight transiting the airspace lateral boundaries of the airspace would be required if 91.155 minimums are maintained. Although 91.157 prescribes special VFR minimums are authorized up to 10000 MSL above the lateral boundaries of the airspace, it does not use ground visibility as controlling unless the aircraft is taking off or landing.

    In a prior life, I flew out of the San Jose area airport Reid Hillview. During the summer, smog was often restricting visibility to below 3 SM and we would get a special VFR clearance inside the control zone (today we call it Class D). Climbing to 1500 feet would often put us in CAVU conditions and we would cancel the special VFR. Same with overflying the airports down below that were low visibility in smog. As long as we established contact if required, there was no request for special VFR if we were just transiting the area. I don’t see the difference if 91.155 is satisfied while above the class D or E extension.

    Mark, 7400.9Z defines the E airspace as an extension to the D, so I would think that if the pilot was flying thru this airspace for the purposes of taking off or landing or entering the traffic pattern, when the tower is open, they control the D and its E extension and when the tower is closed, the extension would and airport surface E would be controlled by TRACON. The airspace has a weird definition and is only 2 NM wide, so it would not be relevant for approaches as far as I can see. Maybe it was added for Helicopter or other low level operations.

    Here are the regulations:

    91.155 (d) “Except as provided in Sec. 91.157 of this part, no person may take off or land an aircraft, or enter the traffic pattern of an airport, under VFR, within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport–
    (1) Unless ground visibility at that airport is at least 3 statute miles; or
    (2) If ground visibility is not reported at that airport, unless flight visibility during landing or takeoff, or while operating in the traffic pattern is at least 3 statute miles”.

    91.157 Special VFR weather minimums.

    (a) Except as provided in appendix D, section 3, of this part, special VFR operations may be conducted under the weather minimums and requirements of this section, instead of those contained in Sec. 91.155, below 10,000 feet MSL within the airspace contained by the upward extension of the lateral boundaries of the controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport.
    (b) Special VFR operations may only be conducted–
    (1) With an ATC clearance;
    (2) Clear of clouds;
    (3) Except for helicopters, when flight visibility is at least 1 statute mile; and
    (4) Except for helicopters, between sunrise and sunset (or in Alaska, when the sun is 6 degrees or more below the horizon) unless–
    (i) The person being granted the ATC clearance meets the applicable requirements for instrument flight under part 61 of this chapter; and
    (ii) The aircraft is equipped as required in Sec. 91.205(d).
    (c) No person may take off or land an aircraft (other than a helicopter) under special VFR–
    (1) Unless ground visibility is at least 1 statute mile; or
    (2) If ground visibility is not reported, unless flight visibility is at least 1 statute mile. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term flight visibility includes the visibility from the cockpit of an aircraft in takeoff position if:
    (i) The flight is conducted under this part 91; and
    (ii) The airport at which the aircraft is located is a satellite airport that does not have weather reporting capabilities.
    (d) The determination of visibility by a pilot in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section is not an official weather report or an official ground visibility report.

    +2 Votes Thumb up 2 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  4. J on Dec 11, 2014

    Thanks for the responses. John, it seems you are saying you can transit class D if it is below basic VFR if you are not landing, etc. But, if the ceiling is below 1,000, even transit through the surface airspace would be against regulations the way I read it:

    91.155c) Except as provided in Sec. 91.157, no person may operate an aircraft beneath the ceiling under VFR within the lateral boundaries of controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet.

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes



  5. J on Dec 11, 2014

    Or rather, only if flying UNDER a 1000 ceiling? So if a low cloud bank sits over the airport at 900’AGL, you are OK to transit the airspace as long as it is at least 1000 ceiling above your flight path…?

    0 Votes Thumb up 0 Votes Thumb down 0 Votes


Answer Question

Our sincere thanks to all who contribute constructively to this forum in answering flight training questions. If you are a flight instructor or represent a flight school / FBO offering flight instruction, you are welcome to include links to your site and related contact information as it pertains to offering local flight instruction in a specific geographic area. Additionally, direct links to FAA and related official government sources of information are welcome. However we thank you for your understanding that links to other sites or text that may be construed as explicit or implicit advertising of other business, sites, or goods/services are not permitted even if such links nominally are relevant to the question asked.