<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ask a Flight Instructor &#187; approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askacfi.com/tag/approach/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askacfi.com</link>
	<description>Flight Training Questions Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Copies of current IFR plates?</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/2595/copies-of-current-ifr-plates.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.askacfi.com/2595/copies-of-current-ifr-plates.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Foley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instrument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=2595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that it it required to have the current text of graphical edition of IFR plates.  The official plates have extremely small print, especially when in turbulance, it can be very hard to read.  Is it legal to make copies of the current charts in order to make them larger and easier to read?  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askacfi.com/2595/copies-of-current-ifr-plates.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are some LNAV/VNAV minimums higher than LNAV only?</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/2552/why-are-some-lnavvnav-minimums-higher-than-lnav-only.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.askacfi.com/2552/why-are-some-lnavvnav-minimums-higher-than-lnav-only.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Student Pilot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instrument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNAV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNAV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=2552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hangar discussion has not yielded a definitive answer to this, so I  thought I would ask here.  Some RNAV (GPS) approaches with LNAV/VNAV  minimums have a note that says &#8220;LNAV/VNAV: fly visual 119 degrees 2.2NM&#8221;  or something similar.  Why is it there?  Aren&#8217;t we always expected to  fly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askacfi.com/2552/why-are-some-lnavvnav-minimums-higher-than-lnav-only.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedure Turn Not Required</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/1667/procedure-turn-not-required.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.askacfi.com/1667/procedure-turn-not-required.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeppesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNAV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=1667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good pilot is always learning right?  Well, I have learned something recently about TAA approaches, procedure turns and how they are charted, especially on the Jeppesen charts.  To begin, let&#8217;s take a look at this traditional RNAV / GPS approach:
This is a standard &#8220;Basic T&#8221; approach that uses a Terminal Arrival Area (TAA) to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askacfi.com/1667/procedure-turn-not-required.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sample Approach Briefing (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/1042/sample-approach-briefing.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.askacfi.com/1042/sample-approach-briefing.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this video you will see a sample arrivial and instrument approach flight crew briefing.  This video is courtesy of the FAA&#8217;s Runway Safety Office. This bonus video was included in the Runway Safety Collection DVD and the segment &#8220;Was that for us?&#8221;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askacfi.com/1042/sample-approach-briefing.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
