<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating Personal Minimums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askacfi.com/439/creating-personal-minimums.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askacfi.com/439/creating-personal-minimums.htm</link>
	<description>Flight Training Questions Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:02:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PlasticPilot</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/439/creating-personal-minimums.htm/comment-page-1#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>PlasticPilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=439#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one I developed the day of my initial IFR checkride. The weather was fine so the briefing was short, but the examiner wrote a pseudo-metar for me to analyze. It included bad visibility and RVR, but was legal. I answered that it was legal to shoot the approach, but that with my experience I would not even try it.

Even today I would probably not do it. Down to 200 feet within 550 meters visibility ? To relativise, this is slightly more than half the length of the lightning ramp...

My two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one I developed the day of my initial IFR checkride. The weather was fine so the briefing was short, but the examiner wrote a pseudo-metar for me to analyze. It included bad visibility and RVR, but was legal. I answered that it was legal to shoot the approach, but that with my experience I would not even try it.</p>
<p>Even today I would probably not do it. Down to 200 feet within 550 meters visibility ? To relativise, this is slightly more than half the length of the lightning ramp&#8230;</p>
<p>My two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/439/creating-personal-minimums.htm/comment-page-1#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=439#comment-859</guid>
		<description>My crosswind minimums change all the time depending on personal currency. Right now, they are real low as I feel rusty but in a couple of months they will go back up. So I agree that only the pilot can really know what his or her mins should be.

Visibility minimums on the other hand are an absolute 5 miles and never less if I am landing VFR. I once flew up the LA basin in 4 miles and was scared the entire time by how little I could see. Had to be almost on top of Riverside Muni before I could see it, not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My crosswind minimums change all the time depending on personal currency. Right now, they are real low as I feel rusty but in a couple of months they will go back up. So I agree that only the pilot can really know what his or her mins should be.</p>
<p>Visibility minimums on the other hand are an absolute 5 miles and never less if I am landing VFR. I once flew up the LA basin in 4 miles and was scared the entire time by how little I could see. Had to be almost on top of Riverside Muni before I could see it, not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
