<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do CFIs have to train in complex aircraft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askacfi.com/415/do-cfis-have-to-train-in-complex-aircraft.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askacfi.com/415/do-cfis-have-to-train-in-complex-aircraft.htm</link>
	<description>Flight Training Questions Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:02:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Sierra, CFI, CFII</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/415/do-cfis-have-to-train-in-complex-aircraft.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Sierra, CFI, CFII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=415#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>Eric, with reference to Flight Instructor PTS requirements the &quot;complex&quot; aircraft callout is missing in the CFR 14 Part 61.45(C)or (e). It must be an errata.

Rafael Sierra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, with reference to Flight Instructor PTS requirements the &#8220;complex&#8221; aircraft callout is missing in the CFR 14 Part 61.45(C)or (e). It must be an errata.</p>
<p>Rafael Sierra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFSpencer</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/415/do-cfis-have-to-train-in-complex-aircraft.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>RFSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=415#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>P.S. regarding the post I just left, here is a link to the document I was reading:

http://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/airmen/test_standards/media/FAA-S-8081-6C.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. regarding the post I just left, here is a link to the document I was reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/airmen/test_standards/media/FAA-S-8081-6C.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/airmen/test_standards/media/FAA-S-8081-6C.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RFSpencer</title>
		<link>http://www.askacfi.com/415/do-cfis-have-to-train-in-complex-aircraft.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>RFSpencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askacfi.com/?p=415#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find the statement: “A complex airplane must be furnished for the performance of takeoff and landing maneuvers, and appropriate emergency procedures.” in the most up to date (November 2006) version of the CFI airplane practical test standards.  It describes what a complex airplane is--but does not state one is reguired as previous versions of the PTS have.  Is there: (1) just a clerical error on the part of the FAA or (2) a change in the requirements or (3) did I miss something in my reading of the document?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find the statement: “A complex airplane must be furnished for the performance of takeoff and landing maneuvers, and appropriate emergency procedures.” in the most up to date (November 2006) version of the CFI airplane practical test standards.  It describes what a complex airplane is&#8211;but does not state one is reguired as previous versions of the PTS have.  Is there: (1) just a clerical error on the part of the FAA or (2) a change in the requirements or (3) did I miss something in my reading of the document?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
